11/7/2023 0 Comments Noscript android downloadSee: multiple open issues for animation jank. The objective metrics I've been able to capture often show the new FFA to be as slow or slower than the previous version, and when it's faster, it's not by much, at least (in my opinion) not close enough to catching up to Chrome to justify a complete browser rewrite, with everything that has entailed. īasically, I think it's very easy to be deceived by placebo effects when what we're talking about is the apparent performance of a browser. ![]() The performance of the GUI is also lacking: it takes so much more time to open menus and use GUI features that the difference is actually clearly visible to the eye. As measured by Speedometer, the new Firefox is less than 10% faster than the old one, and both are barely half as fast as Chrome on the same device. I've consistently found: Javascript performance is not significantly improved by the new browser. I've attempted to measure the objective speed of the browser myself. * Web pages load faster / JS execution is faster? This is also subjective unless objective measurements are used, but this is what people most often mean. * The GUI is better? Subjective at best, I find it worse. ![]() * It has more / better features? No, it seems to have fewer features, at least if add-on support is a good indication. It's extremely vague and some of the obvious meanings are either subjective or can be easily shot down: I really wish people would say what they mean when they make comments like this.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |